Nine New Yorkers shot by cops
Years and years ago, an instructor at the JFK Special Warfare Center at Ft Bragg put together a little instructional chart called, "Murphy's Laws of Combat." It went viral throughout the Army, insofar as something can could have gone viral in the dark ages before Youtube or even email. One iteration is here.
The original Murphy's Law, of course, is, "If something can go wrong, it will." And so the MLOC include such gems of wisdom as,
"If the enemy can't get in, you can't get out."
"The enemy attacks only when you're not yet ready."
These kind of aphorisms were going around a long time before Ft Bragg was even founded. One of my favorites that I drummed into my troops was scripted by Carl von Clausewitz almost 200 years ago: "In war, everything is simple. But even the simplest things are very difficult."
And so we come to the day after the sad day when a man in New York sought and achieved vengeance against the man who terminated him from his job a year ago. The murderer, Jeffrey Johnson, stood on the sidewalk outside his former place of employment and confronted his former boss (or coworker), Steve Ercolino, whom Johnson shot in the head three times.
Then Johnson bagged his pistol and walked away. Alerted by a bystander, two police officers pursued Johnson. According to reports, Johnson made motions with his pistol that the officers perceived as threatening them, so they fired at Johnson 16 times. Seven of those bullets hit Johnson, killing him.
And the other nine bullets hit New Yorkers who were in the line of fire, fortunately killing none. As Glenn observes,
I’m not saying they did the wrong thing, because I don’t think they did. I’m just saying that if it had been a private citizen, rather than a pair of government employees with government guns, this would be treated very differently by Bloomberg and the press.That's true, of course. And like Glenn, I am not finding fault with the officers for shooting Johnson. But 16 shots from 10 feet away? And they miss more than half?
I carried a pistol for a long time in the Army but I never had to gunfight with it. But just time spent in competitive pistol shoots was quite enough to teach me that accurate pistoleering is difficult. I always qualified expert, but no shot can be taken for granted. Under stress, heart rate elevated, moving target, fear factored in - very hard to shoot well.
I don't know what the cops could have done except engage Johnson when they believed he was about to shoot at them. I guess I would have, too. But over and over, I come back to this: 16 shots from 10 feet away? And they miss more than half?
And so my beginning list of Murphy's Law of Police Operations:
1. Police carry guns to defend themselves, not you.
2. Cops are not skilled shooters. If you see a police officer with a drawn gun, run as far as you can as rapidly as you can. (Actually, I did find myself in that situation once, and I did exactly that.)
3. Police bullets are just as happy to kill you as the bad guy.
Add your own in the comments.
10 comments:
When running away, start early because when it comes to outrunning bullets speed is not necessarily fast and bullets are not necessarily specific.
I'm not sure about "running away" specifically, but definitely take cover (and not just concealment). If you can run away behind cover, so much the better.
Actally, "if anything can go wrong, it will" is Murphy's Third Law. If I am not mistaken, the first is "Nothing is as easy as it looks", the second is "Everything costs more than is first estimated." There are a whole series of Murphy's Laws. They were primarily engineering laws, but are easily adapted to other pursuits, such as the military and law enforcement.
Ogrrre
The vigor of police pursuit is inversely proportional to the severity of the alleged crime committed.
The vigor of police pursuit is inversely proportional to the severity of the alleged crime committed.
Don't be too shocked to read in the news about a high volume of shots fired. Maybe the police panicked and maybe they didn't. But they probably know better than us that real life gunfights are not like in the movies. It's unlikely that they can shoot guns out of the shooter's hand.
For years I have laughed at the assertion that only police should be allowed to carry handguns because they are trained professionals.
Consider a 2x2 box. Along one axis is Authority, ow & High. Along the other is Accountability, also Low & High.
Cops operate in a sweet spot: High Authroity, Low Accountability. When they screw up, i.e., shoot innocent bystanders, they don't pay. The taxpayers do, via the govt entity sued.
Civilian CCWers operate in the opposite corner: Low Authority, High Accountability.
Who do you think will exercise more discretion concerning the use of deadly force?
RY/
Butch
Fortunately for them, they didn't have him surrounded.
John Lott has collected much enlightening information over the years. Concealed carry citizens are greatly superior to police in: correctly identifiying the taget, hitting what they are aiming at, limiting collateral damage, and keeping the piece in their pockets in the first place. BTW, a female cop is two and one-half times more likely to pull the trigger than her paranoid brother. When the PC rubber actually hits the road it's a blowout.
Outside the firing range everybody is a lousy shok
Some of my MLOC favorites are:
"Anything you do in combat can get you killed, including (particularly) doing nothing."
"The inch-thick Operations Order never survives the first five minutes of contact with the enemy."
"Tracers work both ways."
I have my own variations:
"Those who laugh at Death should remember that Death always takes a far more serious view of the matter."
As for the NYC shooting, it's unfortunately common to hear of a fusillade of police rounds that rarely hit their target, followed by stories of a fusillade of rounds that actually do hit their target, as opposed to a few well-placed rounds that accomplish the task at hand. (No -- TV is not reality.)
I wonder what rounds the cops were using; how many (possibly) passed through the target to hit those behind?
I'm familiar with the work of Prof Lott cited by James Wilson above -- that & stories in the press (e.g., the mom last week in Dora, Alabama that took out her family's attacker with one shot) give a reasonable person the opinion that 'concealed carry' is an option at least as good if not better than waiting on the police to show up, seeing as how the police don't show up until after a crime is committed.
BTW, you don't open your comments often enough, but let me slide in a thanks for keeping the PFC Hockenberry "For those I love, I will sacrifice" photo above fresh in our minds.
Post a Comment