Tuesday, February 17, 2009

It's the lead

By Donald Sensing

Glenn Reynolds (in full):

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT defends Bush rule on guns. “The Obama administration is legally defending a last-minute rule enacted by President George W. Bush that allows concealed firearms in national parks, even as it is internally reviewing whether the measure meets environmental muster.” Good for them. Hard to imagine a serious environmental objection to the rule, though.
Well, it's the fact that bullets contain lead, in fact, most bullets are nothing but lead. What else could an "environmental muster" be? (Lead shot is already banned for waterfowl hunting.)

Or, just as good - the guns will be banned "for the sake of the children." Firearms will be denounced as an environmental hazard to children.

Surely, Don, you overreach, you may say? Well, no. Keeping lead away from children is one of bureaucracy's favorite duties now. Consider this headline: "Lead Ban Stops Youth ATV and Motorcycle Sales," written on Feb. 2:

[T]he Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, enacted August 14 of last year, will go into effect [on Feb. 10] and ban all products designed for children ages 12 or under which contain lead over specified limits. ...

What exactly happens on Feb 10 for motorcycle dealers? "On February 10 large inventories of motorcycle and ATV products that present no health risk to children could be rendered retroactively illegal and future products prohibited from sale. These products may need to be destroyed resulting in severe hardship for dealers and manufacturers in the motorcycle industry. Along with the current state of the economy, this may be a hit that dealers and manufacturers will not be able to recover from."

But wait, there's more. City Journal on, "The New Book Banning":
[U]nder a law [the same one -- DS] Congress passed last year aimed at regulating hazards in children’s products, the federal government has now advised that children’s books published before 1985 should not be considered safe and may in many cases be unlawful to sell or distribute. Merchants, thrift stores, and booksellers may be at risk if they sell older volumes, or even give them away, without first subjecting them to testing—at prohibitive expense. Many used-book sellers, consignment stores, Goodwill outlets, and the like have accordingly begun to refuse new donations of pre-1985 volumes, yank existing ones off their shelves, and in some cases discard them en masse.
That's the tack that the Obama administration will take: it's the lead that's the problem, so guns must be banned from federal lands. This is not a new tactic, of course, since opponents of Second Amendment rights have long tried to shut down firearms use by trying to cripple ammunition makers and users with absolute liability for ammunition use. It won't matter, either, that ammunition without any lead at all is available on the civilian market. A way will be found, a reason will be given. The present "defense" of the Bush rule is just theater.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Lead?

By that measure no one should be farming in northwestern France.

SFC B said...

The most common, non-enviromental, source of lead poisoning is ingestion items containing lead. If your child is eating parts of its dirt bike, you have issues far greater to worry about than lead poisoning.

Wise Ol Bird said...

Lead isn't a really problem. It is prety inert while in the ground. (See the research done at Little Big Horn tracing the battle throught the riffling of the bullets found on the battle field 100 years after the battle)
The problem is getting the dust in your lungs (kicking up the cordite along the firing line at shooting ranges etc.)

Besides, I have had several chunks in my head for over 25 years. All they have done is keep me from having an MRI...

Spade said...

Lead shot may be banned for waterfowl hunting, but it is totally legal currently for non-waterfowl hunting on federal land. I'm sure impact studies have been done on that and found that it wasn't an environmental problem.

Plus there's also lead free ammo. I currently use one type of it in my FN PS90 (SS195LF is the type of round).

JAL said...

I heard a young guy on the radio yesterday who sells dirt bikes, and, I think, ATVs. This is going to totally destroy his business.

The people who write these laws do not live in a world than many of us live in. My kids did not grow up with dirt bikes or ATVs but some of our friends do, including a family where the parents and all 4 kids had their own and they went out and "recreated" as a family. No deficits noted.

My older kids lived in books --- they were PRE 1985 books. Haven't noticed than any of them (an Apple computer / film geek, a physician, and an Army officer) were intellectually dulled. What was that research again?

Will our society ever learn to live with acceptable risk and common sense???

The environmental wackos and nannies have taken over the asylum.

Anonymous said...

The truly disturbing thing with this trend is that there are already federal laws on the books that ban the manufacture of bullets with *too little* lead in them - on the grounds that the use of other materials renders the bullet "armor piercing." We could see a situation where bullet manufacturers get squeezed from both ends - they can't manufacture bullets with lead, because of the threat to "the children," and they can't manufacture bullets without lead, because that results in evil "armor piercing" ammunition. It sounds like the Catch-22 that the Brady bunch would just love.

Kev said...

"The people who write these laws do not live in a world than many of us live in.
(snip)
Will our society ever learn to live with acceptable risk and common sense???

The environmental wackos and nannies have taken over the asylum."

JAL, those are some of the best statements I've heard all week. Something must be done to get these people out of power; if the Porkulus does indeed fail, it will be time to drive out all of the unproductive class and get people in there who actually Do Something.

Mark Buehner said...

This is what happens when you let people just 'manufacture' and 'buy and sell' whatever they want. Once the government centralizes all this we won't have a problem with children eating dirt bikes any more. There won't be any dirt bikes, and likely the children will be busy in the state factories and voluntary daily mandatory indoctrination camp.