Thursday, April 16, 2009

"When fascism comes to America . . .

By Donald Sensing

... it will look like fascism." Cornell law Prof. William A. Jacobson rebuts and rephrases Sinclair Lewis' line,that "when fascism comes to America, it will be draped in the flag and carrying a cross."

Lewis was wrong. We have had the flag and Christianity for over 200 years, but we have not had fascism.

To the contrary, when fascism comes to America, it will look something like the reaction to the Tea Parties. I do not mean the lunatic rants of the netroots. That's fine. Mockery, hyperbole, and distortion are not the exclusive province of any one political party or ideology. I also do not mean counter-protests. That is fine too.

Fascism is not the exercise of free speech, even offensive free speech. Rather, it is the attempt to silence others through subversion and physical disruption. Think brown shirts in pre-war Germany, and anarchists at almost any world economic meeting. And that is what the Tea Party Crasher phenomenon is all about.
Funny Prof. Jacobsen should make this post the same day news reports hit of fascist students (for that is what they are) at the University of North Carolina successfully shutting down a presentation by former US Congressman Tom Tancredo, invited to speak by a recognized student organization.

Hundreds of protesters converged on Bingham Hall, shouting profanities and accusations of racism while Tancredo and the student who introduced him tried to speak. Minutes into the speech, a protester pounded a window of the classroom until the glass shattered, prompting Tancredo to flee and campus police to shut down the event.
Here's the kicker:
UNC graduate student Tyler Oakley, who had organized the protest, said he regretted the broken window but not silencing Tancredo. "He was not able to practice his hate speech," said Oakley. "You have to respect the right of people to assemble and collectively speak."
Just consider brass of Oakley saying that fascists enjoy the right to assemble and speak while violently crushing the peaceful assembly of those who were trying to do exactly that. Oh, wait - it was hate speech Oakley was shutting down. Well, okay then. "Hate speech," of course, means to the Left, "speech I don't agree with."

But here's the kicker. A group of student describing itself as children of immigrants wanted Tancredo to speak. Junior "Lizette Lopez, 22, vice president of the Carolina Hispanic Association," urged the fascists to let Tancredo talk. "So we would at least like to hear what he has to say if you want to hear what we have to say," Lopez said. The fascists relented only momentarily.

Afterward, Lopez said,
"We were more interested in an intellectual conversation instead of a shouting match," she said. "Ironically, the people that are trying to get our voices heard silenced us."
My dear Ms. Lopez, you are only a junior in college and understandably haven't yet learned the truth of fascism. They in fact are not the slightest bit interested in trying to get your voices heard, immigrant or not. You may think they are your allies, but you are merely their tools. They have no one's interests at heart but their own. Don't believe me? Easy: let the Carolina Hispanic Association itself invite Tancredo to speak on the campus and see whether the same thing happens.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Nice job describing our times. Only 14 days later and we are just being taken down quickly... I was walking through an atique store this afternoon as an elderly couple working their chatted. The kind man was explaining to his wife, as he read the paper, what "hate crimes" would be doing to us. Sharp as a tac, this man like many of us know what's coming down on America yet we are unable to stop it. This very day, April 29, 2009, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act (H.R. 1913) bill was approved by a 249-175.

When combined with existing law...a pastor could be charged with inciting a hate crime for the content of his sermon. An individual could be charged with one for simply resisting the actions or advances of a homosexual or lesbian.

To be frank, the term “FASCISM” was adopted in Italy during the 1920s by followers of Benito Mussolini. Later it was applied to Adolf Hitler of Germany. Fascism glorifies the state at the expense of the individual. It embraces and authoritarian leader, who embodies the state, and often involves racist ideologies, exalting one group at the expense of another. Unlike communism, under which all property is owned by the state, fascism encourages industrial and financial magnates. Like communism, it oversees individual and business activity, employing secret police to insure compliance with the state.

For my relatives who did not make it to America before During WWII, 1941-45, the Axis invasion caused panic. For my father's grandparents in Yugoslavia, foreign occupiers partitioned the country and terrorized its people. Germany, Italy, Hungary, and Bulgaria dismembered Yugoslavia. Germany unleashed a reign of terror and Germanization in northern Slovenia. It resettled Slovenes in Serbia, moved German colonists onto Slovenian farms, and attempted to erase Slovenian cultural institutions. The Catholic hierarchy collaborated with the authorities in Italian-occupied southern Slovenia. The “Independent State of Croatia” was merely a puppet state. Storm troopers eliminated two million Jews, Serbs, and Gypsies through forced religious conversion, deportation, and extreme violence.

Tito supporters occupied almost all of the cabinet posts. New election laws barred alleged wartime collaborators from voting and all government held elections to choose the Communist-controlled People's Front, the descent of the wartime People's Liberation Front that encompassed all non-collaborationist political parties and organizations. The police harassed non-Communist politicians and suppressed their newspapers during the election campaign. Communism relied on “controlled press” that printed only what the government wanted the people to hear. Romania even required its citizens to register their typewriters.

Oh, yeah, the "Fairness Doctrine" is on our horizon now... Will the newly empowered congressional liberals launch a direct legislative assault on religious and conservative broadcasters through the so-called "Fairness Doctrine"?

Or instead, will the Left execute their attack behind closed doors, through the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) using a tactic called "Balanced Community Broadcast Standards" that would force political and religious content to be "balanced" city by city?

Antonio Gramsci, "The Prison Notebooks": http://www.mfairladyblogspot.com/2009/03/peter-labarbera-on-saving-traditional.html

cp said...

Merriam Webster:

a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

Hm Sound like Bush/Cheney to me.

cp said...

When combined with existing law...a pastor could be charged with inciting a hate crime for the content of his sermon. An individual could be charged with one for simply resisting the actions or advances of a homosexual or lesbian.

This is patently false. Please read the law before equating it with Nazi Germany. And leave my wonderful LGBT friends alone to live their lives without your Christian sect interfering!!

Donald Sensing said...

Except, CP, that it has already happened in Canada.