"My grandfather voted Republican til the day he died . . .

... and from then on always voted Democrat."

So goes the old Southerners' joke. Well, no one's laughing now. Investigators for news and law enforcement alike have found dead voters in Colorado. 

And in Virginia. And more in Virginia. 

And in Los Angeles.

And Colorado again.

And nearly two million dead voters in the whole country.

I have said it before, but yet again:

Start here, for instance. Manipulating U.S. Elections: 10 Ways Voting Is Being Hacked by the Left. Why anyone thinks that this November will feature an honest election is beyond me. In Marxist (which is to say, Democrat) thinking, elections are supposed to be rigged.

What is the purpose of this elaborate extravaganza? Marxists have long noted that insofar as its stated purpose is concerned–determining the question of political power in modern society–it is no more than a charade, a political sleight of hand in which the more things seem to change, the more do they remain the same. But Marxists do not deserve any special credit for making such an observation. One hardly has to be a Marxist to grasp the fact that bourgeois elections do not, in any way, impinge upon or alter questions of power. The general cynicism among the masses toward politics and politicians–a cynicism which runs far deeper than can be measured solely by noting the large numbers of people who do not bother to vote in elections–is itself proof that the futility and corruption of bourgeois politics has become a part of U.S. folklore. (Paul Saba, 1980, "Reaffirming the Marxist Theory of the State".) 

The entire orienting point of elections in the Democrat party is not to give the people the power to decide anything, but to make them think they do. Think not? Two names and I rest my case: Sanders, Wasserman-Schulz.

Remember what Stalin said: "It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."